140 RFE 問題請教 (EB1b,NSC)

來源: 2009-04-23 17:27:30 [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀:

前段時間發文問過,今天受到律師寄來的RFE,很frustrated, 6項條件每個都要求提供補充文件,感覺移民官根本就沒怎麽看材料,掃了兩眼就直接RFE了。現在很鬱悶,不知道如何是好。請問有人有類似經曆麽?

其中有兩項要求,尤其不知道怎麽補充,還請各位幫忙看看:

(1) 關於推薦信,它要求:Now, please submit documentary evidence (not additional letters) which corroborate the statements made in the submitted testimonial letters.

這是什麽意思?怎麽證明呢?有人收到過類似的麽?

(2) 關於審稿經曆,它要求:Please submit documentation of the criteria for selection as a judge, panelist, reviewer, etc. Please submit documentary evidence to establish how the beneficiary’s participation is uncommon or otherwise noteworthy relative to others who participate in similar activites.

怎麽證明那個“criteria for selection as a judge…”麽?另外,怎麽證明我和其他審稿人不同呢?

最後還有一個問題:不知道我是否可以再重新提交一下我認為比較重要的材料以引起移民官的注意?

非常感謝!