My understanding is, since the wage filled in ETA750

來源: cth163 2006-11-30 17:57:57 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (824 bytes)
should be reasonable (first approved by SWA, and I guess that is the prevailing wage). And Labor dept may think that your own wage on your paystub is lower than the ETA750 wage (prevailing wage), they are questioning your company if there will be any trouble to raise your wage up to so high, after your case is approved?

So, when Labor dept said "salary was not enough", which salary is not enough? your own, or the one on the ETA750? If it is your own, I think your company has to provide a letter to show your company's status etc to promise again that your wage will be meet the requirement if your GC is approved. If it is the wage on the ETA750 is not enough, that is to say, the prevailing wage your lawyer acquired was not correct as Labor dept found out. Then your lawyer have to argu with Labor dept.

所有跟帖: 

回複:My understanding is, since the wage filled in ETA750 -grapes- 給 grapes 發送悄悄話 (342 bytes) () 12/02/2006 postreply 08:33:31

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”