LUD是9/5 (TSC),係統修複造成的還是?

來源: zeiss 於 2006-09-08 11:15:46 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀： 次 (356 bytes)
Does this mean that the name check has been cleared? Or just a begining of the name check?

It looks the procedure is quite weird:

9/5 my I140 LUD (although already approved)
9/6 my I485 LUD
9/7 my I485 LUD again
9/7 my depedent's I485 LUD
9/8 both I485 LUD again

Hope that it is good sign rather than a database update,:-)

所有跟帖： 

• me too, 覺得你的象是要批了 -greatstar- ♂ 給 greatstar 發送悄悄話 (30 bytes) () 09/08/2006 postreply 11:21:34

• 如果排期到了且 最近沒改地址的話 -greatstar- ♂ 給 greatstar 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 09/08/2006 postreply 11:23:46

• 回複：LUD是9/5 (TSC),係統修複造成的還是? -mikehuang- ♂ 給 mikehuang 發送悄悄話 (55 bytes) () 09/08/2006 postreply 11:40:33

• 回複：回複：LUD是9/5 (TSC),係統修複造成的還是? -zeiss- ♂ 給 zeiss 發送悄悄話 (46 bytes) () 09/08/2006 postreply 11:41:38

• 回複：回複：回複：LUD是9/5 (TSC),係統修複造成的還是? -mikehuang- ♂ 給 mikehuang 發送悄悄話 (181 bytes) () 09/08/2006 postreply 11:52:57

• 回複：回複：回複：回複：LUD是9/5 (TSC),係統修複造成的還是? -mikehuang- ♂ 給 mikehuang 發送悄悄話 (20 bytes) () 09/08/2006 postreply 11:54:40

• 回複：好兆頭 -radiology- ♂ 給 radiology 發送悄悄話 radiology 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 09/08/2006 postreply 11:45:27

請您先登陸，再發跟帖！