請教經驗壇友：關於GAP in Trading

I heard it's a common belief in technical analysis, all gaps would eventually be filled. 

However, I've noticed, at least in PLTR and TSLA trading history, that it's often the contrary: not all gaps have been filled at all or just partially filled, especially this year (when I can spend more time on stock market and pay attention to more details) ... 

I want to learn, does this suggest:

1) PLTR and TSLA are simply /uniquely 不按常規走的股（好比他們的CEO 性格 哈哈）

2） because this is a bull cycle?

3) the necessity of gap-filling might be more of a myth than a rule in any kind of market.

 

Thank you. Have a wonderful weekend.

所有跟帖： 

• gap trading only useful for short term support resistance detect -三心三意- ♂ (0 bytes) () 11/09/2024 postreply 06:37:00

• I never use it for long or even mid term trend analysis -三心三意- ♂ (0 bytes) () 11/09/2024 postreply 06:37:00

• 看看AI是怎麽回答的 -yifan99- ♂ (6409 bytes) () 11/09/2024 postreply 07:21:50

• 你應該問問AI當四大指數巨量跳空上漲以後，市場馬上下跌10-20%的概率，哈哈哈 -三心三意- ♂ (0 bytes) () 11/09/2024 postreply 07:35:00

• AI 回答：20% pullback unlikely, 5-10% possible depending... -yifan99- ♂ (6291 bytes) () 11/09/2024 postreply 08:08:59

• good AI 哈哈哈 -三心三意- ♂ (0 bytes) () 11/09/2024 postreply 08:11:00

• 聰明！ ：） -NewLeaf2021- ♀ (0 bytes) () 11/09/2024 postreply 10:56:47

• 我的觀察是量大的gap一般不fill， good question -cnrhm2017- ♂ (0 bytes) () 11/09/2024 postreply 08:43:10

• 感謝三位壇友周末回複我，解惑了。 -NewLeaf2021- ♀ (0 bytes) () 11/09/2024 postreply 10:52:36