當聯邦官員在執行由聯邦法律授權的職務時，（憲法）至高條款即適用

針對博維諾（Bovino）的保護： 這意味著，隻要博維諾是在執行聯邦法律（如移民法）授權的任務，地方檢察官或法官就很難以“違反州法”為由對他定罪。這也就是所謂的**“聯邦官員免疫權” (Supremacy Clause Immunity)**。

既然博維諾是 Operation Metro Surge 的前線指揮官，他所有的決策（包括搜查、逮捕、部署）都是以聯邦法律為依據的。

 當民主黨政客指控博維諾“恐嚇社區”或“侵犯民權”時，至高條款確保了他是在**“為國辦事”而非“個人犯罪”**。隻要他的行為不被判定為“公然違法且與職責無關”，他就處於該條款的絕對保護之下。

 

This isn’t just wrong — it defies settled law.

David Schoen: “When federal officers are carrying out duties authorized by federal law, the Supremacy Clause applies.”

“That means immunity from state criminal prosecution — a principle settled since 1890.” pic.twitter.com/LXjIqyXMER

— Laura Ingraham (@IngrahamAngle) January 27, 2026

Settled law isn't a suggestion. David Schoen is reminding everyone that the Supremacy Clause has protected federal officers from state prosecution since 1890.