CNN 真的太不要臉了，這不要臉的強盜邏輯真跟中共的有一拚

今天高院判決地區聯邦法官無權發布全國範圍對總統命令的阻止令。 先看看川普的總檢察長Pam Bondi 怎麽說的，再看看CNN 怎麽說的。

PAM BONDI:

Acitve liberal judges have used these injunctions to virtually blocked all president Trumps policies, to put this into perspective, There are a totol of 94 federal judicial districts, 5 of these ederal districts held 35 out of 40 of these nation wide injunctions. 

CNN 的說法：

The high court’s embrace of Trump’s legal positions contrasts with a general resistance of lower court judges who in the early months of Trump’s second presidency have blocked dozens of his executive orders. Some judges have also commented about his larger quest for power.

 

看官評論： CNN 說地區法官總體上持反對川普立場（general resistance of lower court judges）， 可是CNN 論據是 過去幾個月很多川普的行政令被地方法官否決。 可是事實是川普的很多行政令被極少數的地方法官發的全國禁令而暫停。 這極少數左派法官否決大部分總統行政令不正是濫用權力的證據嗎，咋能說明地區法官總體上反對川普立場呢，極少數為啥能代表大多數成為‘總體上’ ？ CNN 的春秋筆法，和厚顏無恥真是得了共匪真傳，不服不行。