Which ranking system is more widely accepted between the above two?
In China we only looked at USNEWS rankings while applying the US undergraduate programs. May be we should have had a look at forbes as well?
I feel Forbes might be miss leading. It is so much difference here!
As far as the rankings for business programs are concerned, USNEWS or Businessweek is more valuable?
Hope people having solid knowledge in this topic could share your knowledge with us,so more Chinese students will benefit while applying for the undergraduate/postgraduate programs in US.
Thanks very much in advance!
USNEWS VS FORBES
所有跟帖:
• 中國人怎麽這麽蠢?別人給你個名單你就信?那都是花錢買來的。 -中國母親- ♀ (0 bytes) () 08/12/2009 postreply 07:50:27
• 回複:中國人怎麽這麽蠢?別人給你個名單你就信?那都是花錢買來的。 -emorysh- ♀ (227 bytes) () 08/13/2009 postreply 20:23:35
• they are 2 different formats -用戶名被占用了- ♂ (159 bytes) () 08/13/2009 postreply 09:39:06
• 回複:they are 2 different formats -emorysh- ♀ (1551 bytes) () 08/13/2009 postreply 20:18:06
• 國內家長和學生都不重視liberal arts學院 -用戶名被占用了- ♂ (312 bytes) () 08/14/2009 postreply 07:13:51
• 今年liberal arts學院比較好申請 -emorysh- ♀ (21 bytes) () 08/14/2009 postreply 07:51:18
• 那幾個大熱門colleages肯定不錯。 -用戶名被占用了- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/14/2009 postreply 08:14:04
• 回複:那幾個大熱門colleages肯定不錯。 -emorysh- ♀ (161 bytes) () 08/14/2009 postreply 09:10:33
• emory你還抱怨?南方名校啊。 -用戶名被占用了- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/14/2009 postreply 10:24:55
• 別給孩子瞎折騰了,emory是名校,聲譽很好的 -用戶名被占用了- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/14/2009 postreply 10:26:12
• 謝謝!看FORBES給排到了80多位,心裏有點不平衡,嗬嗬。 -emorysh- ♀ (0 bytes) () 08/14/2009 postreply 19:51:04
• 你去看看duke排哪裏去了,哈哈 -用戶名被占用了- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/15/2009 postreply 08:19:14
• 也未見得 -rbrb- ♀ (63 bytes) () 08/14/2009 postreply 20:27:06
• 你是(好)異類嘛,哈哈 -用戶名被占用了- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/15/2009 postreply 08:19:50
• 回複:也未見得 -emorysh- ♀ (395 bytes) () 08/16/2009 postreply 06:27:07
• 沒有什麽大區別。 -中國母親- ♀ (0 bytes) () 08/16/2009 postreply 09:39:20
• 本來放這的回帖卻竄位了,在下隻有這個筆名 -emorysh- ♀ (58 bytes) () 08/18/2009 postreply 08:41:37
• USNEWS # 1school: Harvard; FORBES #1 school: West Point -greatway- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/20/2009 postreply 06:43:44