亞裔細分限製華裔子女升學就業, 誰幹的?!

來源: 五洲閑話 2016-10-16 17:53:15 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (21320 bytes)
本文內容已被 [ 五洲閑話 ] 在 2016-10-19 05:59:21 編輯過。如有問題,請報告版主或論壇管理刪除.

誰是我們的敵人, 誰是我們的朋友?這個問題是爬藤的首要問題。

Vote: CA Senate 3rd Reading SCA5 Hernandez Yea: 27 Nay: 9 NV: 3 Absent: 0

(https://legiscan.com/CA/rollcall/SCA5/id/313934)

Name Yea Nay Not Voting Absent
Sen. Joel Anderson [R]   X    
Sen. Jim Beall [D] X      
Sen. Tom Berryhill [R]   X    
Sen. Marty Block [D] X      
Sen. Ronald Calderon [D] X      
Sen. Anthony Cannella [R]     X  
Sen. Ellen Corbett [D] X      
Sen. Lou Correa [D] X      
Sen. Kevin de Leon [D] X      
Sen. Mark DeSaulnier [D] X      
Sen. Noreen Evans [D] X      
Sen. Jean Fuller [R]   X    
Sen. Ted Gaines [R]   X    
Sen. Cathleen Galgiani [D] X      
Sen. Loni Hancock [D] X      
Sen. Edward Hernandez [D] X      
Sen. Jerry Hill [D] X      
Sen. Benjamin Hueso [D] X      
Sen. Robert Huff [R]   X    
Sen. Hannah-Beth Jackson [D] X      
Sen. Steve Knight [R]   X    
Sen. Ricardo Lara [D] X      
Sen. Mark Leno [D] X      
Sen. Ted Lieu [D] X      
Sen. Carol Liu [D] X      
Sen. Holly Mitchell [D] X      
Sen. William Monning [D] X      
Sen. Jim Nielsen [R]     X  
Sen. Alex Padilla [D] X      
Sen. Fran Pavley [D] X      
Sen. Richard Roth [D] X      
Sen. Darrell Steinberg [D] X      
Sen. Norma Torres [D] X      
Sen. Andy Vidak [R]   X    
Sen. Mimi Walters [R]   X    
Sen. Lois Wolk [D] X      
Sen. Roderick Wright [D]     X  
Sen. Mark Wyland [R]   X    
Sen. Leland Yee [D] X      

=================================

看看那些加州SCA5案中令人作嘔的華人政客

加州大學前校董李心培表示,關於學校招生中存在的種族比例問題早在20年前就存在爭議。這次SCA5提案投票中,加州三位華裔參議員均投了讚成票,這讓身為李心培很不能理解。他稱,亞裔民眾推選他們出來,就是希望他們能夠在關鍵時刻維護亞裔居民的權利,保護我們的利益。而這次提案的投票中,他們非但沒有保護亞裔居民,反而倒向另一邊,支持減招亞裔學生。無論他們抱有什麽政治目的,都不能以犧牲亞裔居民的利益作為交換。
    
    ---------------------------------------
    
    加州參議院1月30日以27票讚成對9票反對通過了SCA5提案。該提案稱,目前加州大學係統中的亞裔學生比例過高,要求限製亞裔學生入學比例,提高非裔和拉美裔的入學率。SCA5提案將於近日被提到加州眾議會再次投票。如果眾議會投票通過,SCA5法案將於今年11月舉行公投,最終決定是否恢複在加州大學係統中實行所謂的入學種族平等方案。
    
    SCA5 是由民主黨州參議員賀南德茲(Ed Hrnandz)提出的一項法案。加州曾於1996年通過209法案,禁止公立大學以種族決定入學,政府也不可以根據種族製定聘用標準。參議院通過的SCA5 提案將取消209 法案的部分規定,包括政府部門不能因為個人和團體的種族、性別、膚色和原籍國給予公立教育的特殊待遇。
    
    據美聯社報道稱,今年加州大學係統中,白人和亞裔學生占大學新生的主要比例,非裔和拉美裔學生人數顯現出代表性不足。今年加州大學係統的錄取新生中,36%為亞裔、28.1%為白人、27.6%為拉美裔、4.2%為非裔學生。種族錄取比例的懸殊在加州大學伯克利分校和洛杉磯分校尤為明顯。
    
    提案在州參院獲得通過消息傳開,在灣區亞裔社區引起強烈反響。許多亞裔網友認為,加州大學係統中,亞裔學生比例高是因為亞裔學生學習成績和各方麵的表現出色,他們是憑真本事被大學錄取,並沒有因為族裔背景而受到特殊照顧。一旦提案公投通過,加州公立大學亞裔學生比例將從現在的40%下降到15%,那麽亞裔孩子在大學中勢必受到排擠。
    
    加州大學前校董李心培表示,關於學校招生中存在的種族比例問題早在20年前就存在爭議。這次SCA5提案投票中,加州三位華裔參議員均投了讚成票,這讓身為李心培很不能理解。他稱,亞裔民眾推選他們出來,就是希望他們能夠在關鍵時刻維護亞裔居民的權利,保護我們的利益。而這次提案的投票中,他們非但沒有保護亞裔居民,反而倒向另一邊,支持減招亞裔學生。無論他們抱有什麽政治目的,都不能以犧牲亞裔居民的利益作為交換。
    
    李心培認為,學校錄取是學生自身實力和學習能力所決定的。加州大學內,亞裔學生比例高是因為亞裔學生確實表現出眾,不是種族歧視的表現。李心培相信,SCA5提案在公投中必定會被民眾所否決。
    
    SCA5提案受到加州亞裔父母的格外關注。日前,亞裔民間組織在網絡上組織了反對SCA5提案的在線簽名,希望以此遊說加州民主黨議員們向SCA5投反對或棄權票。
    

GOP Opposes SCA5

SCA5 Text

SCA 5 would allow the State of California to deny an individual or group’s rights to public education on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin.  Click on the image to the right and Read the Bill!

Vote AB2047
Vote SB 185
Vote SCA 5

 

 

 

History

Edward Hernandez has been trying to revise Prop. 209 since he was a member of the State Assembly.  He introduced Assembly Bill 2047 in 2010 to enable discrimination in our post-secondary schools. Democrats completely backed him and Republicans opposed. View the party-line votes. Thankfully, Governor Schwarzenegger vetoed it. As a Senator, in 2011, Hernandez introduced a similar measure (SB 185) that passed out of the Senate on a Party-Line vote with Democrats supporting and Republicans opposing admittance to college based on race rather than merit.  This Constitutional Amendment (SCA 5) not only would have enabled discrimination in our colleges, but at ALL levels of education. The bill was ultimately vetoed by Governor Brown, not because he opposed the concept, but because the issue was under consideration in the courts. Brown's veto message below states that he believes the change needed to be made to the constitution.  That is why the Democrats are back this year with a constitutional amendment. View the Governor's veto message below to learn how he regards this issue of overturning portions of Prop. 209.


Gov. Brown Admits – No Easy Path for Expanded Affirmative Action

KQED News – May 2, 2014

Brown said he believes the April 22 ruling on the Michigan case by the nation’s highest court “shut the door” on any kind of new or expanded racial preferences — unless those rules are enacted by voters.

“It’s not at all clear that if you put it on the ballot, that it could be passed,” he said in the KQED interview.

Brown has long defended affirmative action policies, including during his time as attorney general.

“I do think that because of where we are in the gaps between the races, I think we need some degree of affirmative action,” he said. The governor acknowledged the deep divisions that surfaced during the brief legislative debate over a proposed constitutional amendment to reinstate affirmative action in higher education and contracting in California. But he characterized any effort to bridge that gap as “chancy.” Read more…

Citing use of scare tactics and misinformation by opponents of SCA 5, Senate pro Tem Darrell Steinberg and Assembly Speaker John Perez announced the formation of a joint Senate and Assembly Commission tasked with holding hearings up and down the state to solicit expert testimony, as well as public input, concerning SCA 5 and equal opportunity in California’s public institutions of higher learning.  We will list Bay Area meetings of the Commission in the Calendar of Events.


SB185 VetoLtr

Democrats Regroup and Pull SCA 5 from the Assembly

Expressing concerns they didn’t have the votes to move forward, SCA5 was returned to the Senate.  If the Democrats in the Assembly had followed the lead of their colleagues in the Senate, SCA 5 would have been an initiative on the 2014 November Ballot.  If voters approved the measure, all references to public education would be removed from Proposition 209, impacting students who were expecting to enter college based on merit.  Always a target for repeal by Democrats in the Legislature, 209 amended the state constitution to prohibit state government institutions from considering race, sex or ethnicity in the areas of public employment, public contracting or public education.
SenHuff
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Statement on SCA5 by Republican Senate Leader Bob Huff – March 17, 2014

“Today Speaker Perez sent SCA 5 back to the Senate without taking the matter up in the Assembly.  While this is a temporary victory for the many families and students who have rallied against this attempt to re-introduce institutionalized discrimination in our public schools, we must remain vigilant.”

“Senate President pro Tem Steinberg restated in his release that he still supports SCA 5, but wants a “calm and intelligent discussion about what Affirmative Action is and is not.”’

“The people pushing SCA 5 repeatedly try to change the discussion with misinformation, saying that people don’t understand the issue. The opposite is true. There has been an outcry across the state, because people do understand the issue. As summarized by the non-partisan Legislative Counsel regarding SCA 5, “The California Constitution prohibits the state from discriminating against, or granting preferential treatment to, any individual or group on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin in the operation of public employment, public education, or public contracting. This measure would eliminate this prohibition on state discrimination or preference in the operation of public education.” SCA 5 will allow once again institutionalized discrimination in our public schools.”

“As stated famously by Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court, John Roberts: “The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.”’

“Using their super-majority, Democrats passed SCA 5 out of the Senate on January 30th to the Assembly on a party-line vote. Republicans will continue to oppose this measure in any way, shape or form.”

所有跟帖: 

是華人還投民主黨,基本上是偷渡的吃救濟的吸毒的。 -glock17c- 給 glock17c 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 10/16/2016 postreply 18:00:23

壯士算啥? -cutedolphin- 給 cutedolphin 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 10/16/2016 postreply 19:18:00

高級吃政府的,最高級的是希拉裏。從吃幾百到幾千萬。 -大號螞蟻- 給 大號螞蟻 發送悄悄話 大號螞蟻 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 10/16/2016 postreply 19:22:06

從加州到紐約, 從州大到藤校。亞裔人口比例增加,錄取比例10幾年不變! -五洲閑話- 給 五洲閑話 發送悄悄話 (196 bytes) () 10/16/2016 postreply 18:03:15

爬藤十年努力,細分一夜夢碎。華裔爬藤可以休矣! -五洲閑話- 給 五洲閑話 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 10/16/2016 postreply 18:13:57

有事實,有數據。讚!也請支持民主黨的華人們三思! -大西洋裏來的人- 給 大西洋裏來的人 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 10/16/2016 postreply 18:32:01

華人中,曆來不缺乏為了自己的私利而出賣本族裔根本利益的人 -lisi- 給 lisi 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 10/16/2016 postreply 19:00:11

華人千萬不要忘了SCA5的前車之鑒。不要以為現在安全了就忘了民主黨做的傷害華裔的醜事。 -cutedolphin- 給 cutedolphin 發送悄悄話 (32 bytes) () 10/16/2016 postreply 19:21:30

加跟帖:

當前帖子已經過期歸檔,不能加跟帖!