Here's what Jim Rogers said about the election

TFT: Will the presidential election change the investing picture at all? And what are your thoughts about Mitt Romney’s choice of Paul Ryan as his running mate?

JR: As far as I’m concerned, the election is irrelevant. One [candidate] happens to be from Boston and one from Chicago, and whoever wins, their friends are going to do well, but other than that America is not going to do well. There’s very little difference in any of these guys. None of them understands the problem. These are the guys that got us into trouble. You expect them to get us out?

TFT: You’ve given money to Ron Paul’s campaign. Would he have done a better job?

JR: I suspect he would have. He would have had the problem of dealing with a Congress that is not in sync with his views, but he certainly would have pushed us in a better direction than these guys will.

所有跟帖： 

• 嗯，差不多，隻是有一點不同意。 -storit- ♀ (143 bytes) () 09/06/2012 postreply 20:02:24

• 問題是前麵積下來的,這種情況需要強勢的leader -flyfish- ♀ (0 bytes) () 09/06/2012 postreply 20:05:46

• 說的就是這個 -storit- ♀ (45 bytes) () 09/06/2012 postreply 20:10:47

• 容易，和中國說，你們買的美國國債全部歸0.就當和美國打仗戰敗賠款，嗬嗬 -yasas- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/06/2012 postreply 20:06:23

• 不是國債的問題，嗬嗬。 -storit- ♀ (152 bytes) () 09/06/2012 postreply 20:12:44

• 不頂你偶像啦?給我們講講你的奧運摻賽經曆8 -flyfish- ♀ (0 bytes) () 09/06/2012 postreply 20:10:38

• 可能正在work on 出生證 -flyfish- ♀ (0 bytes) () 09/06/2012 postreply 20:30:22

• 我同意他。為啥那麽多人喜歡ron paul, still not enough to put him in the office -lilipp- ♀ (0 bytes) () 09/06/2012 postreply 20:08:23

• put Bill Clinton back in -flyfish- ♀ (0 bytes) () 09/06/2012 postreply 20:11:40

• 美國製度不好，bill為啥不能再當？！氣死 -lilipp- ♀ (0 bytes) () 09/06/2012 postreply 20:18:10

• 這個的確是的。 -lilipp- ♀ (0 bytes) () 09/06/2012 postreply 20:16:33

• Jim Rogers是高鼻子黃頭發白皮膚的本山大叔 -野生動物攝影家- ♂ (19 bytes) () 09/06/2012 postreply 21:21:28

• 也對，都靠胡悠做法寶，唱的戲文不同 -flyfish- ♀ (0 bytes) () 09/06/2012 postreply 21:56:29