Found ED Chau和Sharon consifer NO for a good reason. They both got way less than 60% in 2012, i,e, swing district。
I spent whole night organizing,top 10 swing distrcits with above two in it。In ED's dsitrcti, Asian 53%。 And Sharon only won by 5500 votes, so has good chance losing this year. She is afraid her competiter Young Kim using SCA5 to win.
We need to influence people in follwoing top 10 swing district: (soure : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_State_Assembly_election)
2012 year: Top10 Marginal D-Asm winners (<60% votes ) | ||||||||
District | Party | Name | Votes | Diff | % | Counties | Ethnic | |
36 | Democratic | Steve Fox | 66,005 | 50.10% | LA-Antelope | L41% A5% W37% | ||
Republic | Ron Smith | 65,860 | 145 | 49.90% | ||||
65 | Democratic | Sharon Quirk-Silva | 68,988 | 52.00% | Orange-Anahheim | L39% A25% W31% | ||
Republic | Chris Norby (incmbentt) | 63,576 | 5,412 | 48.00% | ||||
32 | Democratic | Rudy Salas | 38,759 | 52.90% | kings+kern | L 69% A 3% W20% | ||
Republic | Pedro A. Rios | 34,476 | 4,283 | 47.10% | ||||
8 | Democratic | Ken Cooley | 92,630 | 54.30% | sacramento | L 18% A 9% W61% | ||
Republic | Peter Tateishi | 78,006 | 14,624 | 45.70% | ||||
66 | Democratic | Al Muratsuchi | 102,136 | 54.80% | LA-South | L 21% A26% W46% | ||
Republic | Craig Huey | 84,372 | 17,764 | 45.20% | ||||
49 | Democratic | Ed Chau | 64,791 | 56.40% | LA-west | L 32%, A 53% W13% | ||
Republic | Matthew Lin | 50,153 | 14,638 | 43.60% | ||||
41 | Democratic | Chris Holden | 109,743 | 57.70% | Pasadena | L30% A13% W44% | ||
Republic | Donna Lowe | 80,362 | 29,381 | 42.30% | ||||
21 | Democratic | Adam Gray | 63,349 | 58.20% | Central Valley | L 54% A 6% W36% | ||
Republic | Jack Mobley | 45,534 | 17,815 | 41.80% | ||||
9 | Democratic | Richard Pan (incmbnt) | 86,092 | 58.90% | sacramento-south | L%26 A%22 W34% | ||
Republic | Antonio "Tony" Amador | 60,136 | 25,956 | 41.10% | ||||
16 | Democratic | Joan Buchanan (incmbnt) | 125,952 | 59.20% | Pleasanton | L11% A20% W64% | ||
Republic | Al Phillips | 86,803 | 39,149 | 40.80% | ||||
xx | 48 | Democratic | Roger Hernandez (incmbnt) | 74,642 | 59.40% | LA | L64% A13% W20% |
This is 36th asm wik link:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California%27s_36th_State_Assembly_district
other asm #, just replace 36th in above link。
首先,我祝加州華人成功。 同時,從SCA5立法過程本身可看出中國美國憲法神聖與尊嚴的本質區別。
在這裏,SCA5(加州第5憲法修正案)的通過需經州參議院眾議院表決,最後還需全加州公民的投票表決("簽字")。 在此期間,還給於利益相關各方及加州全體公民充分的時間(~2年)醞釀討論以和平民主的方式(請願集會遊行示威)表達自己的意見。 如果真的最終通過,加洲華人還可請有名律師告上美國高法。這顯示出美國這個國家對憲法的神聖與尊嚴多麽的尊重和愛護。
再來看我們國家的憲法。她連一個國家主席都保護不了! 中國憲法稱"公民有言論自由",卻把寫了幾篇文章的劉曉波打入監獄。 80年代,為了使一個不是中央委員的鄧小平連任軍委主席,竟然粗暴修改憲法特地為其增加一個條款"軍委主席可以不是中央委員"。 天大的笑話。 中國的憲法時時刻刻都在遭受著這個黨這個政府的踐踏,使其權威和尊嚴盡失。
我國的憲法就是一張廢紙!
SCA5早在 Dec. 2012 就已提出。 這一年多的時間,加州華人都去幹什麽去了? 為什麽直到參議院通過後半個月才醒過味來? 是不是整天都在催孩子參加補習班或SAT練習? 是不是在參議院通過後半個月裏都還沉浸在春節圓宵節的歡樂中?
這才真是"隻顧埋頭讀書,不顧抬頭看路"。 辛辛苦哭考了個SAT滿分,卻差點被人家一個SCA5擺平。
我們中國人,缺乏參政意識和能力,可謂"政治殘廢"。 究其根源,這全是因為我們多年生活在一個獨裁製度下,我們的參政議政及其他公民權利全被共產黨剝奪。 結果,到了新的國都,難於適應人家的民主製度,不能保衛自己的權利。 卻有些華人一邊民主抗議SCA5, 而又不遺餘力地詆毀美國民主製度為中共獨裁辯護.