Diamonds have 64 facets and reflect light, which is dazzling! Since self-media beings drive more than 64 facets, so much like reflecting light on diamonds, thereby prompting that I often read the comments of a blog post before I go on to its text to find the reasons to refuse or invest my time. Does that practice make any sense?

Go with the flow: One in a thousand blog readers write a blog; 1% of readers would make comments, as shown by statistics. So, reading comments prompts, you got top 1% there valuable. Don't you think so? Why love diamonds?

鑽石有64個切麵而折光反光,令人眼花瞭亂! 自媒體眾生相比鑽石更驅多於64個切麵而折光反光: 我常從評論讀起而找思路緣由讀正文。

千分之一的博客讀者寫blog, 1% readers comment - so valuable. Don't you think so? 為什麽愛鑽石? 

Zuànshí yǒu 64 gè qiēmiàn ér zhéguāng fǎnguāng, lìng rén yǎnhuā liǎo luàn! Zì méitǐ zhòngshēngxiàng bǐ zuànshí gèng qū duō yú 64 gè qiēmiàn ér zhéguāng fǎnguāng: Wǒ cháng cóng pínglùn dú qǐ ér zhǎo sīlù yuányóu dú zhèngwén. Qiān fēn zhī yī de bókè.

Ref: 

誠理角節,隻寫一點specific不及其餘: 隻寫一點才可specific, e.g., ? 樓