didn't think much about this topic, but we can borrow some talking points for Chinese Americans:
1) "明白信奉社會達爾文主義的西方列強根本不把弱者放在眼裏,更不會希望中國成為強國。" (Ref. 1) -- equal justice under law - where's the balancing point of weakness?
2) "朝鮮不但給中國提供了戰略緩衝,而且直接給倭寇構成了強大的壓力。" (Ref. 1) -- What's "戰略緩衝" ethical groups for ABC group? How to"利用other ethical groups 之間的爭奪,為ABC的發展獲取了極大的實利。"
Diversity is an ABC's anchor - connecting to a particular ethical group and forming a strong tie will balance out shocks coming toward ABC group. Immigration is a foundering stone for the US, a way to keep diversity, a growing force for prosperity. Jewish and Italian cultures are closely related to Chinese culture -
3) "沒有朝鮮戰爭,中國人在國際上的地位不可能有根本的改變,加州的排華法案都不會廢除。" (Ref. 2) -- ABC should never bad-mouth their heritaged China.
英國人HASTINGS寫的朝鮮戰爭史記載道:“西方對中國人的態度基於一種根深蒂固的信念:中國人不是人,而是接近於動物”("Western treatment of the Koreans and the Chinese was dictated by a deeply rooted conviction that they were not people like themselves, but near-animals...")。一個英國軍官回憶到,美國士兵對他說:“These people (Chinese or Koreans) are savages." 美國士兵在其回憶錄中,回憶到,他們本來以為中國人就是那種逆來順受的樣子。